Why Tuesday’s results should worry Republicans ahead of midterms

3
Views
Listen to this article

This is an adapted excerpt from the Aug. 5 episode of “The 11th Hour with Ali Velshi.”

There are fewer than 90 days until the midterm elections, and I’m going to ask you to look away from the shiny object in this week’s news cycle — Tuesday’s dramatic conclusion of Democrats’ primary for Michigan’s Senate seat — because when you scratch just below the surface, you’ll see a series of results from across the country that tell a story about how each party is going into these fast-approaching elections.

Despite a lot of hot takes about how ugly and damaging the Michigan Senate primary was for Democrats, the takeaway from Tuesday was that Republicans are facing a real challenge.

To understand this, you need to look southwest from Michigan to Missouri, which also had a primary on Tuesday. 

Under Amendment 4, the initiatives put on the ballot by the Republican-controlled Legislature would not be held to the same threshold. And that is the tell that this was about silencing voters. 

In Missouri, voters like their ballot measures. In recent years, they have used them to enshrine the right to abortion, to raise the minimum wage, to expand Medicaid and to legalize marijuana and sports betting.

But on Tuesday, voters actually rejected a ballot measure, one that would have made it harder to pass future ballot measures. Amendment 4 would have required proposed ballot measures to achieve a majority, not statewide, but in each individual congressional district of the state, in order to pass. In the end, this was rejected by 80% of voters (and ironically, rejected in each congressional district).

Amendment 4 was a plan hatched by Republican state legislators to limit the power that their own constituents hold at the ballot box. Abortion rights, minimum wage, medicaid expansion, marijuana — none of those previous ballot measures would have passed under Republicans’ proposed threshold.

However, under Amendment 4, the initiatives put on the ballot by the Republican-controlled Legislature would not be held to the same threshold. And that is the tell that this was about silencing voters. 

Something very similar played out next door in Kansas, where voters rejected an amendment put on the ballot by the Republican-controlled Legislature that would have required the popular election of state Supreme Court justices rather than the current process, in which the governor appoints them and they later face a retention vote. 

There are valid arguments both for and against the popular election of judges. But this ballot measure was not about that principle. It was about undermining one specific ruling by the state Supreme Court, as well as the expressed will of Kansas voters.

In 2019, the Kansas Supreme Court established a constitutional right to abortion, and Republicans have gotten creative in looking for ways to overturn that decision, even after residents overwhelmingly voted to enshrine abortion as a constitutional right in 2022. After that vote, Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach suggested popularly electing justices as a way to “slowly and quietly” advance anti-abortion judges. 

But on Tuesday, voters denied the “slow and quiet” attempt, and they did it swiftly and loudly: 61% voted against the referendum. 

MS NOW (formerly MSNBC) is a cable news and opinion network owned by Versant, featuring a lineup focused on progressive political commentary.

Top Stories

The Daily Fresh